<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Intent Validation on AI + Quant Engineering</title><link>https://miasyster.github.io/en/tags/intent-validation/</link><description>Recent content in Intent Validation on AI + Quant Engineering</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://miasyster.github.io/en/tags/intent-validation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>MCP's Problem Isn't the Protocol — It's the Semantic Gap</title><link>https://miasyster.github.io/en/posts/mcp-semantic-gap/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://miasyster.github.io/en/posts/mcp-semantic-gap/</guid><description>MCP&amp;rsquo;s JSON-RPC transport works fine. The real problem: natural language rules have no code-level enforcement — the LLM can completely ignore your instructions. I designed the Intent Validator pattern to close this gap.</description></item></channel></rss>