<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>State Machine on AI + Quant Engineering</title><link>https://miasyster.github.io/en/tags/state-machine/</link><description>Recent content in State Machine on AI + Quant Engineering</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://miasyster.github.io/en/tags/state-machine/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why I Didn't Use Multi-Agent Architecture for My Quant Research System</title><link>https://miasyster.github.io/en/posts/why-not-multi-agent/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://miasyster.github.io/en/posts/why-not-multi-agent/</guid><description>Multi-agent is the hot paradigm in AI engineering. I chose single agent + state machine for my AI-driven quant research system. Not because multi-agent is too hard, but because the problem structure doesn&amp;rsquo;t match.</description></item></channel></rss>